<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s New iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pixelsocks.com/2010/01/27/apples-new-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pixelsocks.com/2010/01/27/apples-new-ipad/</link>
	<description>Where games go to find out what they&#039;re worth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:34:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixelsocks</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelsocks.com/2010/01/27/apples-new-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-6614</link>
		<dc:creator>pixelsocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelsocks.com/?p=2861#comment-6614</guid>
		<description>Now that there has been some time for the hype machine to do its work, I&#039;m actually surprised by the dearth of buzz for the device. The burden of proof falls on marketing, and they haven&#039;t pulled it off. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that there has been some time for the hype machine to do its work, I&#8217;m actually surprised by the dearth of buzz for the device. The burden of proof falls on marketing, and they haven&#8217;t pulled it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katiegreen</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelsocks.com/2010/01/27/apples-new-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>katiegreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelsocks.com/?p=2861#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>Okay, so these are shiny, and geeks like shiny things. But the idea that it will be another goldrush for app developers seems either like a) a lie, or b) that there has been complaining on the part of developers that the current iPod touch isn&#039;t sufficient for their purposes. But unless they&#039;ll let apps be exclusive to the iPad, which they may, I don&#039;t see how developers benefit.

Maybe they were complaining that the iPod touch is just too damn portable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so these are shiny, and geeks like shiny things. But the idea that it will be another goldrush for app developers seems either like a) a lie, or b) that there has been complaining on the part of developers that the current iPod touch isn&#8217;t sufficient for their purposes. But unless they&#8217;ll let apps be exclusive to the iPad, which they may, I don&#8217;t see how developers benefit.</p>
<p>Maybe they were complaining that the iPod touch is just too damn portable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelsocks.com/2010/01/27/apples-new-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-6589</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelsocks.com/?p=2861#comment-6589</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t figure the market for this device, but I&#039;m sure that somehow, one will develop and it&#039;ll be a smash hit like EVERYTHING ELSE Apple markets. I, for one, won&#039;t mind. Soon I will be living in Star Trek; I always wanted a data pad like Captain Picard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t figure the market for this device, but I&#8217;m sure that somehow, one will develop and it&#8217;ll be a smash hit like EVERYTHING ELSE Apple markets. I, for one, won&#8217;t mind. Soon I will be living in Star Trek; I always wanted a data pad like Captain Picard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

